Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Deutsche Bank Natl Trust Co. v. Cynthia Watson, et, 16-51375 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 16-51375 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-51375 Document: 00514163432 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-51375 September 20, 2017 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-C, Asset Backed Pass- Through Certificates, Plaintiff - Appellee v. CYNTHIA WATSON; RICHARD WATSON, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United Stat
More
Case: 16-51375 Document: 00514163432 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-51375 September 20, 2017 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-C, Asset Backed Pass- Through Certificates, Plaintiff - Appellee v. CYNTHIA WATSON; RICHARD WATSON, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CV-00823 Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Defendants-Appellants Cynthia Watson and Richard Watson appeal the ruling of the district court that Plaintiff-Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-51375 Document: 00514163432 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2017 No. 16-51375 2005-C, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, is entitled to summary judgment and the court’s ruling that the real property in dispute is subject to judicial foreclosure. We have reviewed the record on appeal, including but not limited to the briefs of the parties and the district court’s Order of November 1, 2016 in explication of its Judgment of that date, and we are satisfied that summary judgment is eminently correct. For essentially the same reasons set out by the district court in its abovesaid Order, its Judgment is in all respects, AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer