Filed: Sep. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-10116 Document: 00514156176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-10116 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar September 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO MILLAN-MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-307-5 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Jud
Summary: Case: 17-10116 Document: 00514156176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-10116 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar September 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO MILLAN-MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-307-5 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judg..
More
Case: 17-10116 Document: 00514156176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 17-10116
Fifth Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar September 14, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO MILLAN-MADRID,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CR-307-5
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Millan-Madrid has moved
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10116 Document: 00514156176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2017
No. 17-10116
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Califor-
nia,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.
2011). Millan-Madrid has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2