Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lesly Gatheright v. Haley Barbour, 17-60149 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 17-60149 Visitors: 53
Filed: Dec. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-60149 Document: 00514271138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-60149 FILED December 13, 2017 LESLY GATHERIGHT, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. HALEY BARBOUR; JIM HOOD; BEN CREEKMORE; LON STALLINGS; HONEY USSERY; MICKEY MALLETTE; CALHOUN COUNTY MISSISSIPPI SHERIFF'S OFFICE; DEWAYNE WINTER; TRACY MCGUIRT, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Cou
More
Case: 17-60149 Document: 00514271138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-60149 FILED December 13, 2017 LESLY GATHERIGHT, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. HALEY BARBOUR; JIM HOOD; BEN CREEKMORE; LON STALLINGS; HONEY USSERY; MICKEY MALLETTE; CALHOUN COUNTY MISSISSIPPI SHERIFF'S OFFICE; DEWAYNE WINTER; TRACY MCGUIRT, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:16-CV-3 Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff Lesly Gatheright appeals the dismissal of his claims against several Mississippi state and county actors stemming from his arrest and indictment on two charges of felony bad check. We have carefully considered this appeal in light of the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-60149 Document: 00514271138 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 No. 17-60149 Having done so, we find no error in the district court’s dismissal of the claims. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer