Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-20779 Document: 00514346855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-20779 February 14, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GIULLIAN STEELE; RAUL ALEMAN; YURY X. BASTOS; JARROD DENYER; SUSAN MCMILLAN, ET AL Plaintiffs - Appellants Cross-Appellees v. LEASING ENTERPRISES, LIMITED, Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Te
Summary: Case: 16-20779 Document: 00514346855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 16-20779 February 14, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk GIULLIAN STEELE; RAUL ALEMAN; YURY X. BASTOS; JARROD DENYER; SUSAN MCMILLAN, ET AL Plaintiffs - Appellants Cross-Appellees v. LEASING ENTERPRISES, LIMITED, Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Tex..
More
Case: 16-20779 Document: 00514346855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 16-20779 February 14, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
GIULLIAN STEELE; RAUL ALEMAN; YURY X. BASTOS; JARROD
DENYER; SUSAN MCMILLAN, ET AL
Plaintiffs - Appellants Cross-Appellees
v.
LEASING ENTERPRISES, LIMITED,
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CV-2789
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The appellants challenge the district court’s determination of the
amount of attorneys’ fees awarded on remand in this Fair Labor Standards Act
case. Steele v. Leasing Enters., Ltd.,
826 F.3d 237 (5th Cir. 2016). The appellee
cross-appeals only as to the fee award for appellate work. We have considered
this matter on the basis of the briefs, the record, the applicable law, and oral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-20779 Document: 00514346855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2018
No. 16-20779
argument. Having done so, we conclude that the district court did not abuse
its discretion in determining the amount of attorneys’ fees awarded. Thus, we
AFFIRM.
2