Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-10667 Document: 00514465201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-10667 FILED Summary Calendar May 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN SALAZAR-SANCHEZ, also known as Mario Ayala Guzman, also known as Manuel Barreto-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-
Summary: Case: 17-10667 Document: 00514465201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-10667 FILED Summary Calendar May 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN SALAZAR-SANCHEZ, also known as Mario Ayala Guzman, also known as Manuel Barreto-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-2..
More
Case: 17-10667 Document: 00514465201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 17-10667 FILED
Summary Calendar May 9, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN SALAZAR-SANCHEZ, also known as Mario Ayala Guzman, also
known as Manuel Barreto-Sanchez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-291-1
Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Salazar-Sanchez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Salazar-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-10667 Document: 00514465201 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2018
No. 17-10667
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2