Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Kedrick Hawkins, 17-11017 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 17-11017 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-11017 Document: 00514544437 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-11017 United States Court of Appeals Conference Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED July 6, 2018 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEDRICK CORTEZ HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-78-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER
More
     Case: 17-11017      Document: 00514544437         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/06/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 17-11017                      United States Court of Appeals

                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                          July 6, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                               Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEDRICK CORTEZ HAWKINS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:16-CR-78-2


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Kedrick Cortez Hawkins has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Hawkins has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hawkins’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11017    Document: 00514544437     Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/06/2018


                                 No. 17-11017

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer