Filed: Aug. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-11183 Document: 00514584449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-11183 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LARRY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-207-4 Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Taylor has moved for leave to with
Summary: Case: 17-11183 Document: 00514584449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-11183 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LARRY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-207-4 Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Taylor has moved for leave to withd..
More
Case: 17-11183 Document: 00514584449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-11183
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LARRY TAYLOR,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:10-CR-207-4
Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Taylor has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Taylor has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Taylor completed the sentence
imposed upon revocation of his supervised release and is no longer in custody.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-11183 Document: 00514584449 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2018
No. 17-11183
The district court did not impose an additional term of supervised release.
Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address.
See Spencer v. Kemna,
523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United States v. Lares-Meraz,
452
F.3d 352, 354-55 (5th Cir. 2006).
The appeal is therefore DISMISSED AS MOOT, and counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.
2