Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-50349 Document: 00514349350 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-50349 FILED Summary Calendar February 15, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ADRIAN GARCIA, also known as Nanis, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-1298-5 Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judg
Summary: Case: 17-50349 Document: 00514349350 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-50349 FILED Summary Calendar February 15, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ADRIAN GARCIA, also known as Nanis, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-1298-5 Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judge..
More
Case: 17-50349 Document: 00514349350 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 17-50349 FILED
Summary Calendar February 15, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ADRIAN GARCIA, also known as Nanis,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-1298-5
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Garcia has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-50349 Document: 00514349350 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2018
No. 17-50349
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2