Case: 17-50491      Document: 00514370669         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/02/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                     No. 17-50491
                                   c/w No. 17-50496
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                  Summary Calendar                              FILED
                                                                            March 2, 2018
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                       Clerk

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OMAR ENRIQUE VERASTEGUI-SAENZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 3:17-CR-388-1
                            USDC: No. 3:15-CR-242-1


Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar Enrique
Verastegui-Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States
v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Verastegui-Saenz has not filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50491   Document: 00514370669   Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/02/2018


                                No. 17-50491
                              c/w No. 17-50496
record reflected therein.   We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
consolidated appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the CONSOLIDATED
APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                     2