Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-20094 Document: 00514700060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-20094 FILED Conference Calendar October 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, also known as Commandante, also known as Mando, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-529-1 Before KI
Summary: Case: 18-20094 Document: 00514700060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-20094 FILED Conference Calendar October 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, also known as Commandante, also known as Mando, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-529-1 Before KIN..
More
Case: 18-20094 Document: 00514700060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-20094 FILED
Conference Calendar October 26, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, also known as Commandante, also known as
Mando,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-529-1
Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Armando Hernandez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-20094 Document: 00514700060 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2018
No. 18-20094
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2