Filed: Oct. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50092 FILED Conference Calendar October 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SEALED APPELLEE, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CR-451-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent the appellant in th
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50092 FILED Conference Calendar October 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SEALED APPELLEE, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CR-451-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent the appellant in thi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-50092 FILED
Conference Calendar October 12, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
SEALED APPELLEE,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SEALED APPELLANT,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:13-CR-451-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent the appellant in this
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). The appellant has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 18-50092
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2