U.S. v. GLOVER, 17-41266 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: infco20180927096
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: PER CURIAM . * The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Glover has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Glover has filed a response and a request for appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Glover's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal
Summary: PER CURIAM . * The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Glover has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Glover has filed a response and a request for appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Glover's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal ..
More
PER CURIAM.*
The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Glover has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Glover has filed a response and a request for appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Glover's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Glover's request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
FootNotes
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: Leagle
