Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-10943 THE INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY; LEGACY MULTIFAMILY NORTH III, L.L.C.; CPF PC RIVERWALK, L.L.C.; HLI WHITE ROCK, L.L.C.; BRICK ROW APARTMENTS, L.L.C., Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion 04/09/2019, 5 Cir., 920 F.3d 890 ) Before DAVIS, JONES, and ENG
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 17-10943 THE INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY; LEGACY MULTIFAMILY NORTH III, L.L.C.; CPF PC RIVERWALK, L.L.C.; HLI WHITE ROCK, L.L.C.; BRICK ROW APARTMENTS, L.L.C., Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion 04/09/2019, 5 Cir., 920 F.3d 890 ) Before DAVIS, JONES, and ENGE..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-10943
THE INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY; LEGACY MULTIFAMILY NORTH III,
L.L.C.; CPF PC RIVERWALK, L.L.C.; HLI WHITE ROCK, L.L.C.; BRICK
ROW APARTMENTS, L.L.C.,
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 04/09/2019, 5 Cir., 920 F.3d 890)
Before DAVIS, JONES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
( ) Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel
Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of
the panel nor judge in regular active service of the court having
requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (FED. R. APP.
P. and 5TH CIR. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
( / Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel
Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court
