Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-41247 Document: 00514782023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41247 January 4, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EPIFANIO ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1375-1 Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Summary: Case: 17-41247 Document: 00514782023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41247 January 4, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EPIFANIO ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1375-1 Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T..
More
Case: 17-41247 Document: 00514782023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 17-41247 January 4, 2019
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EPIFANIO ACOSTA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:16-CR-1375-1
Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Epifanio Acosta has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Acosta has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Acosta’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-41247 Document: 00514782023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2019
No. 17-41247
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2