Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-11137 Document: 00514871587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11137 FILED Conference Calendar March 13, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRYCE CLAIR CLARK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CR-12-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: Case: 18-11137 Document: 00514871587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11137 FILED Conference Calendar March 13, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRYCE CLAIR CLARK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CR-12-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
Case: 18-11137 Document: 00514871587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-11137 FILED
Conference Calendar March 13, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BRYCE CLAIR CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:18-CR-12-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Bryce Clair Clark has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Clark has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Clark’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-11137 Document: 00514871587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2019
No. 18-11137
appellate review. Accordingly, Clark’s motion for appointment of new counsel
on appeal is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2