Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jamar Richardson, 18-11225 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 18-11225 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-11225 Document: 00514950913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11225 FILED Conference Calendar May 9, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMAR MONTRAL RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18-CR-100-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER
More
     Case: 18-11225      Document: 00514950913         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/09/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 18-11225                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                       May 9, 2019
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMAR MONTRAL RICHARDSON,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:18-CR-100-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jamar Montral
Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Richardson has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-11225    Document: 00514950913     Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/09/2019


                                 No. 18-11225

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer