Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Noe Juarez, 18-30574 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 18-30574 Visitors: 216
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-30574 Document: 00514869721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30574 March 12, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NOE JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:11-CR-95-4 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing th
More
     Case: 18-30574      Document: 00514869721         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/12/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                    No. 18-30574                            March 12, 2019
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE JUAREZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 2:11-CR-95-4


Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Noe Juarez raises arguments
that under the law of the case doctrine are foreclosed. See United States v.
Agofsky, 
516 F.3d 280
, 283 (5th Cir. 2008). Juarez’s unopposed motion for
summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.




       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer