Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-30671 Document: 00514912497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30671 April 11, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce TODD ALEXANDER-CLOUD ABSHIRE, Clerk Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 3:16-CV-669; 3:16-CV-852 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and ENGEL
Summary: Case: 18-30671 Document: 00514912497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30671 April 11, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce TODD ALEXANDER-CLOUD ABSHIRE, Clerk Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 3:16-CV-669; 3:16-CV-852 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and ENGELH..
More
Case: 18-30671 Document: 00514912497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 18-30671 April 11, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
TODD ALEXANDER-CLOUD ABSHIRE, Clerk
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC Nos. 3:16-CV-669; 3:16-CV-852
Before JOLLY, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant
in this disability discrimination suit. We have reviewed that ruling, the briefs,
the trial court record, and the applicable law. We have also heard the
arguments of counsel. We AFFIRM the judgment essentially for the reasons
the district court cited for concluding that “24/7” availability was an essential
function of the law enforcement job. That the position was “subject to call 24
hours a day, 7 days a week” was listed in the relevant posting for the job, 42
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-30671 Document: 00514912497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/11/2019
No. 18-30671
U.S.C. § 12111(8) (citing an employer’s “written description[s] before
advertising or interviewing applicants” as evidence of what is an essential
function), and it is undisputed that plaintiff cannot meet that requirement
with or without a reasonable accommodation.
2