Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-30709 Document: 00514788165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30709 January 9, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk HARVEY RAY LEXING, individually and as Next Friend of EML, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity; ALBERT E. LOOMIS, individually and in his official capacity; MARY HAMILTON, individually and as an employee of Albert E. Loomis
Summary: Case: 18-30709 Document: 00514788165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30709 January 9, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk HARVEY RAY LEXING, individually and as Next Friend of EML, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity; ALBERT E. LOOMIS, individually and in his official capacity; MARY HAMILTON, individually and as an employee of Albert E. Loomis,..
More
Case: 18-30709 Document: 00514788165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-30709 January 9, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk HARVEY RAY LEXING, individually and as Next Friend of EML, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity; ALBERT E. LOOMIS, individually and in his official capacity; MARY HAMILTON, individually and as an employee of Albert E. Loomis, III; MARKETA GARNER WALTERS, in her official capacity; KEESHA BORDELON, individually and in her official capacity; ANIKA LASHAYE CARSTON; JO CASTON, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:17-CV-1092 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
