Case: 18-50464      Document: 00514864585         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/08/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 18-50464                            March 8, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO MENDOZA-PEREZ, also known as Felix Perez-Valles, also
known as George,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:94-CR-445-1


Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gustavo Mendoza-
Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Perez has not filed a response. Mendoza-Perez
seeks to appeal an aspect of his sentence. Having reviewed counsel’s brief and


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-50464    Document: 00514864585     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/08/2019


                                 No. 18-50464

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, we agree with counsel that
there is no nonfrivolous basis for such an appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2