Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10074 Document: 00515121573 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10074 FILED Conference Calendar September 17, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JIMI DEE VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CR-45-1 Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CUR
Summary: Case: 19-10074 Document: 00515121573 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10074 FILED Conference Calendar September 17, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JIMI DEE VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CR-45-1 Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURI..
More
Case: 19-10074 Document: 00515121573 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 19-10074 FILED
Conference Calendar September 17, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JIMI DEE VALDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:18-CR-45-1
Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jimi Dee Valdez has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Valdez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10074 Document: 00515121573 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/17/2019
No. 19-10074
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2