Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10230 Document: 00515088199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10230 FILED Conference Calendar August 22, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ALVIDREZ-DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 5:18-CR-93-1 Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 19-10230 Document: 00515088199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10230 FILED Conference Calendar August 22, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ALVIDREZ-DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 5:18-CR-93-1 Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 19-10230 Document: 00515088199 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 19-10230 FILED
Conference Calendar August 22, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
MIGUEL ALVIDREZ-DELGADO,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
No. 5:18-CR-93-1
Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Alvidrez-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10230 Document: 00515088199 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2019
No. 19-10230
Delgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Alvidrez-Delgado has not filed a response. We have reviewed coun-
sel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi-
bilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2