Case: 19-40084      Document: 00515135364         Page: 1    Date Filed: 09/27/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 19-40084                                FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                    September 27, 2019
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LILIANA ROSAS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:17-CR-140-2


Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorneys retained to represent Liliana Rosas have moved for leave
to withdraw and have filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011).
Rosas has not filed a response. We have reviewed the attorneys’ brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein.               We concur with their
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40084      Document: 00515135364   Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/27/2019


                                 No. 19-40084

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the attorneys are
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2