Filed: Jun. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10696 Document: 00515449918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10696 June 11, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ACACEDRIC RASHOD WARE, also known as CD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-226-1 Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Ju
Summary: Case: 19-10696 Document: 00515449918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10696 June 11, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ACACEDRIC RASHOD WARE, also known as CD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-226-1 Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Jud..
More
Case: 19-10696 Document: 00515449918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-10696 June 11, 2020
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ACACEDRIC RASHOD WARE, also known as CD,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CR-226-1
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Acacedric Rashod Ware has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Ware has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10696 Document: 00515449918 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2020
No. 19-10696
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2