Case: 19-40123      Document: 00515327930         Page: 1    Date Filed: 03/02/2020




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 19-40123
                                                                           FILED
                                                                       March 2, 2020
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                           Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MELISSA MARTINEZ,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:18-CR-453-2


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Melissa Martinez pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a
quantity of less than 50 kilograms, that is, approximately 15.2 kilograms
(34.98 pounds) of marijuana and was sentenced to 14 months of imprisonment
and two years of supervised release. She contends that the district court erred
in applying a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) based on its
finding that she had an aggravating role in the offense. Because she objected


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40123     Document: 00515327930     Page: 2   Date Filed: 03/02/2020


                                  No. 19-40123

to the enhancement in the district court, she preserved the issue for appeal.
See United States v. Fillmore, 

, 255 (5th Cir. 2018). “We therefore
review the district court’s finding regarding [Martinez’s] role in the offense for
clear error.” 

report (PSR) had an adequate factual basis, and the
district court was entitled to rely on it because Martinez did not present any
evidence to rebut it. See United States v. Harris, 

, 230 (5th Cir.
2012).   The PSR shows that Martinez recruited her coconspirator David
Monsivais; offered to pay Monsivais between $200 and $350 to smuggle and
distribute the marijuana; picked up Monsivais in her vehicle on the morning
of the offense, which they drove to Mexico; instructed Monsivais on what to say
to the border patrol officers at the port of entry; and asked Monsivais two
weeks before the instant offense to accompany her on a similar trip. Because
the district court’s finding that Martinez had an aggravating role in the offense
is plausible in view of the record as a whole, the district court did not clearly
err in imposing this two-level enhancement. See 

;
United States v. Ochoa-Gomez, 

, 282 (5th Cir. 2015); United States
v. Alaniz, 

, 619 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Golden, 

, 736 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Garcia, 625 F. App’x 680,
682–83 (5th Cir. 2015) (unpublished); United States v. Sanchez-Gaucin, 595 F.
App’x 344, 346 (5th Cir. 2014) (unpublished).
      Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                        2