Case: 19-40418      Document: 00515322223         Page: 1    Date Filed: 02/26/2020




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 19-40418
                                                                                 FILED
                                                                         February 26, 2020
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN PABLO GARCIA, also known as Juan Pablo Garcia-Zapata, also
known as Eduardo Lopez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Eastern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:18-CR-160-1


Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Pablo Garcia
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders
v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40418    Document: 00515322223    Page: 2   Date Filed: 02/26/2020


                                No. 19-40418

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2