Case: 19-40850      Document: 00515442877         Page: 1        Date Filed: 06/05/2020




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 19-40850
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                            June 5, 2020
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                          Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL RANGEL-BAZAN,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:19-CR-908-1


Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The    Federal     Public    Defender      appointed      to     represent           Miguel
Rangel-Bazan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States
v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Rangel-Bazan has filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein, as well as Rangel-Bazan’s response.               We concur with counsel’s


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40850      Document: 00515442877   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/05/2020


                                 No. 19-40850

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2