Filed: Oct. 19, 2021
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2021
Case: 21-60222 Document: 00516060718 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 21-60222
FILED
October 19, 2021
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Kevin Vincent Ellis,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
No. 1:20-CR-98-1
Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Kevin Ellis appeals the 90-month within-guidelines sentence imposed
for possession of a firearm as a felon. He contends that his offense level was
erroneously enhanced by four for his possessing the firearm in connection
with another felony offense. Seeking to enforce the waiver of appeal in Ellis’s
*
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin-
ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-60222 Document: 00516060718 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2021
No. 21-60222
plea agreement, the government moves to dismiss the appeal or, in the alter-
native, for summary affirmance.
Whether an appeal waiver bars an appeal is a question this court
reviews de novo. United States v. Keele,
755 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 2014). The
question turns on “a two-step inquiry: (1) whether the waiver was knowing
and voluntary and (2) whether the waiver applies to the circumstances at
hand, based on the plain language of the agreement.” United States v. Bond,
414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005).
The record reflects that both those conditions are met here. Ellis
maintains that the court should apply a miscarriage-of-justice exception and
disregard the waiver. “Though some other circuits recognize such an excep-
tion, we have declined explicitly either to adopt or to reject it.” United States
v. Barnes,
953 F.3d 383, 389 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
141 S. Ct. 438 (2020). We
do not do so now.
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, the alternative
motion for summary affirmance is DENIED, and the appeal is
DISMISSED.
2