Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 15, 1926
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 15 F.2d 1013 (1926) HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio. No. 4693. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. October 15, 1926. Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Haveth E. Mau, U. S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error. *1014 PER CURIAM. Judgment of the District Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494 , 45 S. Ct.
Summary: 15 F.2d 1013 (1926) HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio. No. 4693. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. October 15, 1926. Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error. Haveth E. Mau, U. S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error. *1014 PER CURIAM. Judgment of the District Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494 , 45 S. Ct. 1..
More
15 F.2d 1013 (1926)
HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY
v.
Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio.
No. 4693.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 15, 1926.
Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Haveth E. Mau, U. S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the District Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischman v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; United States v. Gordin (C. C. A. 6) 9 F.(2d) 394.
