Judges: Hicks, Martin, and McAllister, Circuit Judges
Filed: Mar. 02, 1942
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 127 F.2d 291 (1942) BLUE GRASS MINING CO. et al., Appellant, v. W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellees. W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellants, v. BLUE GRASS MINING CO., et al., Appellees. Nos. 8870, 8871. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 2, 1942. S. S. Willis, of Ashland, Ky., and J. W. Craft and W. A. Stanfill, both of Hazard, Ky., for appellants and cross-appellees. *292 J. R. Simmonds, of Johnson City, Tenn., W. E. Faulkner, of Hazard, Ky., and B. P. Wootton, of Frankfort, Ky., for ap
Summary: 127 F.2d 291 (1942) BLUE GRASS MINING CO. et al., Appellant, v. W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellees. W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellants, v. BLUE GRASS MINING CO., et al., Appellees. Nos. 8870, 8871. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 2, 1942. S. S. Willis, of Ashland, Ky., and J. W. Craft and W. A. Stanfill, both of Hazard, Ky., for appellants and cross-appellees. *292 J. R. Simmonds, of Johnson City, Tenn., W. E. Faulkner, of Hazard, Ky., and B. P. Wootton, of Frankfort, Ky., for app..
More
127 F.2d 291 (1942)
BLUE GRASS MINING CO. et al., Appellant,
v.
W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellees. W. E. RICHARDSON et al., Appellants,
v.
BLUE GRASS MINING CO., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 8870, 8871.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 2, 1942.
S. S. Willis, of Ashland, Ky., and J. W. Craft and W. A. Stanfill, both of Hazard, Ky., for appellants and cross-appellees.
J. R. Simmonds, of Johnson City, Tenn., W. E. Faulkner, of Hazard, Ky., and B. P. Wootton, of Frankfort, Ky., for appellees and cross-appellants.
Before HICKS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These causes, which were consolidated for hearing, having been submitted on oral argument, briefs of counsel, and the six-volume record, and the court, having duly considered and deliberated upon the same, is of opinion that the District Court correctly decided all the issues involved, for the reasons clearly and fully appearing in the opinion, findings of fact (supported by substantial evidence), and conclusions of law of the district judge.
Accordingly, the decree of the district court, 29 F. Supp. 658, is, in all particulars, affirmed.
