Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge, 10913_1 (1949)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 10913_1 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 14, 1949
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 179 F.2d 237 CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Albert E. SORGE, Appellee. No. 10913. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Dec. 14, 1949. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Frank A. Picard, Judge. John C. Shields, William R. Althans, Detroit, Mich., and Weadock & Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., Jerome Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., for appellant. Heilman & Purcell, Saginaw, Mich., and Robert H. Brucker, Saginaw, Mich., John P. Purcell, an
More

179 F.2d 237

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Albert E. SORGE, Appellee.

No. 10913.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Frank A. Picard, Judge.

John C. Shields, William R. Althans, Detroit, Mich., and Weadock & Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., Jerome Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., for appellant.

Heilman & Purcell, Saginaw, Mich., and Robert H. Brucker, Saginaw, Mich., John P. Purcell, and Robert H. Brucker, Saginaw, Mich., for appellees.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

2

And it appearing that the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial evidence, and that the court correctly applied the law in its rulings and charge to the jury;

And no reversible error being shown:

3

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer