Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arthur Clark Moore v. United States, 11888_1 (1949)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11888_1 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 02, 1949
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 179 F.2d 240 Arthur Clark MOORE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 11888. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1949. Appeal from the Eastern District of Michigan, Bay City; Frank Picard, Judge. Appellant not represented. Vincent Fordell, Detroit, Mich., Edward T. Kane, Detroit, Mich., for appellee. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This case was heard upon the record, briefs of respective parties and oral argument
More

179 F.2d 240

Arthur Clark MOORE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11888.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1949.

Appeal from the Eastern District of Michigan, Bay City; Frank Picard, Judge.

Appellant not represented.

Vincent Fordell, Detroit, Mich., Edward T. Kane, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case was heard upon the record, briefs of respective parties and oral argument of counsel for appellee, and the Court being sufficiently advised;

2

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U.S. 254, 42 S. Ct. 309, 66 L. Ed. 607; United States ex rel. Lombardo v. McDonnell, 7 Cir., 153 F.2d 919, 920; United States ex rel. Pasela v. Fenno, 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 593, 595.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer