Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Greene v. United States, 11287 (1951)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11287 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 12, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 188 F.2d 571 GREENE v. UNITED STATES. No. 11287. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 12, 1951. Bruce I. Petrie, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant. Ferdinand Powell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn. (Otto T. Ault, Chattanooga, Tenn., and Ferdinand Powell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for appellee. Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Upon appeal from a motion to vacate sentences, it appears that there were five counts to the indictment and that the appellant
More

188 F.2d 571

GREENE
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 11287.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 12, 1951.

Bruce I. Petrie, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Ferdinand Powell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn. (Otto T. Ault, Chattanooga, Tenn., and Ferdinand Powell, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon appeal from a motion to vacate sentences, it appears that there were five counts to the indictment and that the appellant was sentenced to a total term of five years all sentences having been made concurrent.

2

The appellant charges that the several counts allege the same offense and that count four is invalid. He presents no meritorious challenge to the validity of the fifth count which charged violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 7, 661. The maximum penalty under this section is five years.

3

Count five supports the judgment. It is settled law that if a sentence is supported by any valid count it must stand. Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S. Ct. 180, 76 L. Ed. 306; Reynolds v. United States, 6 Cir., 280 F. 1.

4

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer