Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Celina Mutual Casualty Company v. H. Kenneth Conklin, 11399 (1951)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11399 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 13, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 192 F.2d 1020 CELINA MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. H. Kenneth CONKLIN, Appellee. No. 11399. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Dec. 13, 1951. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington; Hiram Church Ford, Judge. George R. Smith, Dale R. Booth, Lexington, Ky., for appellant. Stoll, Keenon & Park and Leer Buckley, all of Lexington, Ky., for appellee. Before SIMONS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The abov
More

192 F.2d 1020

CELINA MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
H. Kenneth CONKLIN, Appellee.

No. 11399.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington; Hiram Church Ford, Judge.

George R. Smith, Dale R. Booth, Lexington, Ky., for appellant.

Stoll, Keenon & Park and Leer Buckley, all of Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

2

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer