Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Richard L. York, 11690 (1953)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11690 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 06, 1953
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 203 F.2d 564 The BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Richard L. YORK, Appellee. No. 11690 United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 6, 1953. Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, T. Lamar Jackson, C. Kenneth Clark, of counsel, for appellant. Herbert & Dombey, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel: 2 And it appearing that it wa
More

203 F.2d 564

The BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Richard L. YORK, Appellee.

No. 11690

United States Court of Appeals
Sixth Circuit.

April 6, 1953.

Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, T. Lamar Jackson, C. Kenneth Clark, of counsel, for appellant.

Herbert & Dombey, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel:

2

And it appearing that it was a question of fact whether appellant was negligent in grounding its semaphore tower so that in the event of lightning striking the tower a side flash passing into the telegraph shanty was probable and foreseeable, and whether defects existed in the equipment maintained by appellant in appellee's telegraph shanty, and whether such circumstances or either of them, if found to exist, caused or proximately contributed to appellee's injury;

3

And it appearing that the evidence was rightly submitted to the jury under proper instructions; Gleeson v. Virginia Midland R. Co., 140 U.S. 435, 11 S. Ct. 859, 35 L. Ed. 458; Benner v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, 348 Mo. 928, 156 S.W.2d 657. Cf. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine R., 329 U.S. 452, 67 S. Ct. 401, 91 L. Ed. 416.

4

And no reversible error appearing from the record;

5

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer