Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Yellow Cab Company v. Pearl Brown, 12019_1 (1954)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 12019_1 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 20, 1954
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 216 F.2d 954 YELLOW CAB COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, v. PEARL BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 12019. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. October 20, 1954. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Jones, Judge. Halle, Haber, Berick & McNulty, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant. Harrison, Spangenberg & Hull, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The above cause coming on to be heard on the r
More

216 F.2d 954

YELLOW CAB COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
PEARL BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 12019.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 20, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Jones, Judge.

Halle, Haber, Berick & McNulty, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Harrison, Spangenberg & Hull, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the controlling issues were factual, properly determinable by the jury; that its verdict was sustained by substantial evidence; that there was no reversible error in the charge of the district court, or in its order overruling appellant's motion for a new trial, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer