Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, 12720_1 (1957)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 12720_1 Visitors: 33
Filed: Apr. 08, 1957
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 245 F.2d 244 57-1 USTC P 9667 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Arthur E. HERBKERSMAN and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, Appellees. No. 12720. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 8, 1957. Hugh K. Martin and Richard H. Pennington, Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, and Harlan Pomeroy, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Arthur E. Herbkersman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees. Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 The j
More

245 F.2d 244

57-1 USTC P 9667

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Arthur E. HERBKERSMAN and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, Appellees.

No. 12720.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 8, 1957.

Hugh K. Martin and Richard H. Pennington, Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, and Harlan Pomeroy, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Arthur E. Herbkersman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the district court, D.C., 133 F. Supp. 495, is affirmed upon the authority of Haynes v. United States, 353 U.S. 81, 77 S. Ct. 649, 1 L. Ed. 2d 671.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer