Filed: Oct. 15, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 260 F.2d 313 Russell C. JOHNSON and Crest-Craft Company, Appellants, v. Harold DORSEY, Appellee. No. 13427. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. October 15, 1958. Gorman, Davis & Hengelbrok, Dolle & Rueger, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants. Lee J. Hereth of Cowell & Fletcher, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee. Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys an
Summary: 260 F.2d 313 Russell C. JOHNSON and Crest-Craft Company, Appellants, v. Harold DORSEY, Appellee. No. 13427. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. October 15, 1958. Gorman, Davis & Hengelbrok, Dolle & Rueger, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants. Lee J. Hereth of Cowell & Fletcher, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee. Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys and..
More
260 F.2d 313
Russell C. JOHNSON and Crest-Craft Company, Appellants,
v.
Harold DORSEY, Appellee.
No. 13427.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
October 15, 1958.
Gorman, Davis & Hengelbrok, Dolle & Rueger, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants.
Lee J. Hereth of Cowell & Fletcher, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.
Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys and on the record in the case;
2
And it appearing that there is not merit in the points of alleged error urged by appellants; and that the submission to the jury of defendant's Exhibit No. 4 — produced for identification and not formally introduced in evidence — was harmless, especially in view of the fact that the exhibit was read to the jury;
3
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
