Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Andrew Barrick, Trustee v. American Bakeries Company, 14008_1 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 14008_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 09, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 285 F.2d 426 Andrew BARRICK, Trustee, et al., Appellant, v. AMERICAN BAKERIES COMPANY et al., Appellees. No. 14008. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. November 9, 1960. Robert L. Barton, Columbus, Ohio, and John G. Cardinal, Cleveland, Ohio, Hornbeck, Knachel, McLaughlin & Ritter, and Harold H. Kahn, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief, for appellants. Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio, and John D. Barricklow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, Thomas P. Mulligan, Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Cle
More

285 F.2d 426

Andrew BARRICK, Trustee, et al., Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN BAKERIES COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 14008.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

November 9, 1960.

Robert L. Barton, Columbus, Ohio, and John G. Cardinal, Cleveland, Ohio, Hornbeck, Knachel, McLaughlin & Ritter, and Harold H. Kahn, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief, for appellants.

Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio, and John D. Barricklow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, Thomas P. Mulligan, Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, and Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen., on brief, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed, 162 F. Supp. 882, on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Jones.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer