Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John MacHibroda v. United States, 14087 (1960)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 14087 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 06, 1960
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: 280 F.2d 379 John MACHIBRODA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 14087. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. June 6, 1960. David Caldwell, Cincinnati, Ohio (Appointed by the Court), for appellant. Richard M. Colasurd, Asst. U. S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, Russell C. Ake, U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee. Before MARTIN, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This cause has been heard and considered upon appeal from the order of the United States Distr
More

280 F.2d 379

John MACHIBRODA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14087.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 6, 1960.

David Caldwell, Cincinnati, Ohio (Appointed by the Court), for appellant.

Richard M. Colasurd, Asst. U. S. Atty., Toledo, Ohio, Russell C. Ake, U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause has been heard and considered upon appeal from the order of the United States District Court denying the motion to vacate sentences aggregating forty years, imposed for bank robbery.

2

We think District Judge Kloeb, 184 F. Supp. 881, acted with due discretion in the matter and that, upon the facts confronting him, he properly applied the doctrine of this court pronounced in Johnson v. United States, 6 Cir., 239 F.2d 698, 699, which was quoted by the district judge in his opinion. See, also, Sandroff v. United States, 6 Cir., 174 F.2d 1014. We think the instant case differentiates on its facts from Teller v. United States, 6 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 871.

3

The order of the United States District Court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer