Filed: Apr. 08, 1960
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 276 F.2d 955 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. MILLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Appellee. No. 14173. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 8, 1960. Mansfield, DeWitt & Sulzbach, Detroit, Mich., for appellant. Markle & Markle, Detroit, Mich., for appellee. Before CECIL, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal from an order of the District Court granting separate trials o
Summary: 276 F.2d 955 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. MILLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Appellee. No. 14173. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 8, 1960. Mansfield, DeWitt & Sulzbach, Detroit, Mich., for appellant. Markle & Markle, Detroit, Mich., for appellee. Before CECIL, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal from an order of the District Court granting separate trials of..
More
276 F.2d 955
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Appellant,
v.
MILLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Appellee.
No. 14173.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 8, 1960.
Mansfield, DeWitt & Sulzbach, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Markle & Markle, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before CECIL, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal from an order of the District Court granting separate trials of the issues raised by the complaint and the third-party complaint is hereby granted on the ground that the order sought to be reviewed is not a final appealable order, but is an interlocutory order relating to a collateral matter not involving an extraordinary situation. Kowalski, v. Holden, 6 Cir., 1960, 276 F.2d 359; McPherson v. Hoffman, 6 Cir., 1960, 275 F.2d 466 and Regec v. Thornton, 6 Cir., 1960, 275 F.2d 801.
