Filed: Dec. 11, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 311 F.2d 224 Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 14929. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. December 11, 1962. 1 Appeal from the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Toledo. 2 Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant. 3 Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee. 4 Before McALLIS
Summary: 311 F.2d 224 Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 14929. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. December 11, 1962. 1 Appeal from the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Toledo. 2 Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant. 3 Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee. 4 Before McALLIST..
More
311 F.2d 224
Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14929.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
December 11, 1962.
1
Appeal from the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Toledo.
2
Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.
3
Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.
4
Before McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.
ORDER.
5
This cause came on to be heard on the briefs, argument of counsel, and the full record in the case;
6
And it appearing after due consideration thereof that the action of the District Judge in granting defendant-appellee's motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-appellant herein for failure to state a claim upon which the relief sought could be granted constitutes no reversible error;
7
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
