Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 19369_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 19369_1 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 18, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 418 F.2d 920 70-1 USTC P 9139 Madeleine C. HACKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Madeleine C. HACKMAN et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 19368, 19369. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Dec. 18, 1969. Madeleine C. Hackman, in pro per. Michael H. Singer, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Bennett N. Hollander, Daniel B. Ro
More

418 F.2d 920

70-1 USTC P 9139

Madeleine C. HACKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Madeleine C. HACKMAN et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 19368, 19369.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1969.

Madeleine C. Hackman, in pro per.

Michael H. Singer, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Bennett N. Hollander, Daniel B. Rosenbaum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellee.

Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon consideration of the briefs, oral argument and record, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioners did not sustain the burden of proof upon them to establish their claim that the determinations of deficiencies against them by the Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue, were erroneous.

2

It is therefore ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States be and they are hereby affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer