Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John D. McConnell v. George E. Barker, 74-1732 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 74-1732 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 08, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 504 F.2d 1110 John D. McCONNELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George E. BARKER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 74-1732. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 8, 1974. John D. McConnell, pro se. John M. Famularo, Asst. Commonwealth Atty., Lexington, Ky., for respondent-appellee. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 In this case, in which petitioner-appellant has attempted to perfect an appeal from an order of the district court denying his application for
More

504 F.2d 1110

John D. McCONNELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
George E. BARKER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 74-1732.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1974.

John D. McConnell, pro se.

John M. Famularo, Asst. Commonwealth Atty., Lexington, Ky., for respondent-appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

In this case, in which petitioner-appellant has attempted to perfect an appeal from an order of the district court denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus, has come on for consideration pursuant to Rule 3(e), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. It appearing that no timely notice of appeal was filed directed to the final order of the district court, and that although advised of his right under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, no motion for permission to file a belated notice of appeal was filed within sixty days of the entry of said final order, it is concluded that this Court is without jurisdiction, and accordingly,

2

It is ordered that this appeal be and it hereby is dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer