Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Donelson Packing Company, Inc. And Riegel Provision Company, 76-1053 (1978)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 76-1053 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 06, 1978
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 569 F.2d 430 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2742 , 83 Lab.Cas. P 10,625 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DONELSON PACKING COMPANY, INC. and Riegel Provision Company, Respondents. No. 76-1053. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 6, 1978. Petition To Enforce An Order of The National Labor Relations Board Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Alan Cirker, James M. Hirschhorn, Janet McCaa, Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Arthur F. Graham, T
More

569 F.2d 430

99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2742, 83 Lab.Cas. P 10,625

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
DONELSON PACKING COMPANY, INC. and Riegel Provision Company,
Respondents.

No. 76-1053.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Petition To Enforce An Order of The National Labor Relations Board

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Alan Cirker, James M. Hirschhorn, Janet McCaa, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Arthur F. Graham, Tiffin, Ohio, for Donelson Co.

Robert J. Affeldt, Sylvania, Ohio, for Riegel Co.

ORDER

Before PECK, ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges.

1

This case is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 220 NLRB No. 159-(D&O 1). It being concluded that the findings of fact filed by the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the order of the Board be and it hereby is enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer