Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

77-1219 (1979)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 77-1219 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 18, 1979
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 595 F.2d 1320 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837 , 86 Lab.Cas. P 11,380 DETROIT PLASTIC MOLDING CO., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervenors. No. 77-1219. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 18, 1979. Ronald J. Santo, Martin Jay Galvin, Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Lawrence J. Song, Deputy Associate
More

595 F.2d 1320

101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2837, 86 Lab.Cas. P 11,380

DETROIT PLASTIC MOLDING CO., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,
and
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and
Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervenors.

No. 77-1219.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

April 18, 1979.

Ronald J. Santo, Martin Jay Galvin, Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Elliott Moore, Lawrence J. Song, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent.

John A. Fillion, Gen. Counsel, Jordan Rossen, Marley S. Weiss, Detroit, Mich., for intervenor Inter. Union, UAW.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, ENGEL, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

On receipt and consideration of a petition for review filed in the above-styled case and cross-petition for enforcement filed by the National Labor Relations Board (See case reported at 228 N.L.R.B. No. 113e (1977)); and

2

Finding in the whole record substantial evidence to uphold the Board's finding that these two near-by, closely related plants constituted an appropriate bargaining unit (without necessarily being the only appropriate bargaining unit possible); and

3

Finding no arbitrary or capricious action on the part of the Board in its determination,

4

The order of the Board is hereby enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer