Filed: Nov. 07, 1979
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 642 F.2d 1001 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl SUTTON, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3 and 78-5074. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1979. ORDER 1 A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows: 2 The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay
Summary: 642 F.2d 1001 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl SUTTON, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3 and 78-5074. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1979. ORDER 1 A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows: 2 The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay t..
More
642 F.2d 1001
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl SUTTON, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3 and 78-5074.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 7, 1979.
ORDER
1
A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
2
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court, 605 F.2d 260, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.
4
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and the cases will be scheduled during the February, 1980 session.
