Filed: Jul. 17, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 770 F.2d 165 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. CHARLES AND RENATE FREESE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CORNING GLASS WORKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. NO. 83-1814 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 7/17/85 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED ORDER BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief C
Summary: 770 F.2d 165 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. CHARLES AND RENATE FREESE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CORNING GLASS WORKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. NO. 83-1814 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 7/17/85 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED ORDER BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief Ci..
More
770 F.2d 165
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLES AND RENATE FREESE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CORNING GLASS WORKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
NO. 83-1814
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
7/17/85
E.D.Mich.
AFFIRMED
ORDER
BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief Circuit Judge; MERRITT and CONTIE, Circuit Judges.
1
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
2
The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
