Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charles Sasher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 85-5786 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 85-5786 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 13, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 782 F.2d 1043 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. CHARLES SASHER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. 85-5786 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 12/13/85 ORDER BEFORE: ENGEL, KENNEDY and MILBURN, Cir
More

782 F.2d 1043

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLES SASHER, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

85-5786

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

12/13/85

ORDER

BEFORE: ENGEL, KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the appellee, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to remand for reconsideration pursuant to the new mental impairment regulations. 50 Fed. Reg. 35066 (1985) (to be codified in 20 C.F.R. 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1. The appellant has responded in opposition thereto.

The appellant, Charles Sasher, is appealing the district court order dated June 12, 1985, denying his request for supplemental security income benefits based on disability under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1381a. The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the district court on August 1, 1985.

Section 5(c)(1) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-460, requires the Secretary to reexamine any case receiving a final administrative decision after October 9, 1984, in which a denial of disability benefits based on alleged mental impairment was made. The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration affirmed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge denying benefits on October 11, 1984. The language of Pub. L. No. 98-460, Section 5(c)(1) is mandatory and the case must therefore be remanded.

1

Accordingly, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded to the district court for further remand to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for readjudication according to the new regulations promulgated pursuant to Pub. L. No. 98-460.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer