Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John Henry Wooden v. John Draper, Davidson County Criminal Court Judge, 85-5901 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 85-5901 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 15, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 780 F.2d 1024 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. (The decision of the Court is referenced in a "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions" appearing in the Federal Reporter.) JOHN HENRY WOODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN DRAPER, DAVIDSON COUNTY CRIMINA
More

780 F.2d 1024

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
(The decision of the Court is referenced in a "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions" appearing in the Federal Reporter.)
JOHN HENRY WOODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHN DRAPER, DAVIDSON COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.

85-5901

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

11/15/85

APPEAL DISMISSED

M.D.Tenn.

ORDER

BEFORE: MERRITT, MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.

1

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellant's response to this Court's October 23, 1985 order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed because of a late filed notice of appeal.

2

It appears from the record that final judgment was entered on August 30, 1985 and that the notice of appeal filed on Tuesday, October 1, 1985, one day late (the 30th day was Sunday, September 29, so it was due to be filed by Monday, September 30). Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant in his response states that he placed his notice of appeal in the institutional mail system for delivery to the post office, four days before it was due. The envelope containing the notice of appeal is postmarked September 30. Mailing of a notice of appeal does not constitute filing. Pryor v. Marshall, 711 F.2d 63 (6th Cir. 1983).

3

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b) specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

4

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer